WHO experts reevaluate safety of aspartame

WHO experts reevaluate safety of aspartame

Artificial Sweetener Aspartame Under Scrutiny: Is It Safe?

aspartame

The artificial sweetener aspartame is no stranger to controversies. Currently, two separate committees comprised of health experts from around the world are scrutinizing aspartame. The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) is investigating whether aspartame is a carcinogen, while the WHO’s Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives is studying the acceptable daily intake of aspartame. Both committees are expected to release their reports on July 14, according to leaked documents.

While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration continues to deem aspartame safe, health officials in the United States are concerned that the parallel reviews might undermine public confidence in the scientific process, especially at a time when skepticism about science is on the rise.

Qi Sun, an associate professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, mentioned that the cancer research committee of the WHO classifies a broad range of items as carcinogens, even including mobile devices. He emphasized that the ruling on whether aspartame is a carcinogen ultimately depends on the available evidence. Currently, the evidence is scarce to confidently proclaim that aspartame is cancerous or completely safe.

Dr. James Farrell, a gastrointestinal oncologist at the Yale School of Medicine, also acknowledged the need to address the question raised about the safety of aspartame. He highlighted that dismissing these concerns without considering the objective medical and scientific perspectives would be unwise.

Aspartame can be found in popular beverages such as Coke Zero Sugar, Diet Coke, Sprite Zero, Pepsi Zero Sugar, and Mountain Dew Zero Sugar. The Calorie Control Council, a trade group for artificial sweetener manufacturers, and the International Council of Beverages Association (ICBA) have voiced their objections to the potential ruling against aspartame. They emphasize that aspartame’s safety has been supported by extensive scientific research and regulatory approvals around the world.

The WHO clarified that the committee decisions on aspartame will complement each other and that the FDA will continue to make its own determinations regarding aspartame guidelines.

This is not the first time the WHO has provided guidance on sugar substitutes. In a previous recommendation, the organization advised against using artificial sweeteners to lose weight, as they did not lead to a sustained reduction in obesity.

Despite concerns surrounding aspartame, both experts and industry representatives suggest moderation and exploring alternative options for a healthier lifestyle. Dr. Farrell emphasizes the importance of moderation and suggests limiting aspartame intake if safety concerns arise. Meanwhile, Qi Sun proposes opting for healthier alternatives like water, unsweetened teas, or low-fat milk. These options allow individuals to improve their overall health without worrying about the potential risks associated with consuming artificially sweetened beverages.

While the debate over the safety of aspartame continues, it is vital to carefully consider the available evidence and make informed choices regarding our sugar intake. As the WHO committees finalize their reports, it is our responsibility to stay informed and maintain a balanced approach to our dietary decisions.

Sources:

  • CNN
  • Statements by Calorie Control Council and International Council of Beverages Associations