Infection Control Guidelines Spark Controversy: Are Hospitals Putting Profit Over Health?
Backlash Against Revised Infection Control Guidelines for Hospitals
Critics disapprove new infection control recommendations for hospitals.
Advisors to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are getting ready to unleash their newly updated guidelines for hospital infection control, and boy, are people talking about it. This is the first update since 2007, so it’s a pretty big deal.
The guidelines suggest that surgical masks are just as effective as N-95 masks in preventing the spread of respiratory infections during routine care. Now, while this may sound like good news, some healthcare workers are concerned that this move is more about protecting the hospital’s bottom line than the health of its workers. In fact, CNN reported that healthcare workers worry that these guidelines might be putting them at risk. Yikes!
The Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee, in their infinite wisdom, are expected to wrap up their meeting on Friday. Now here’s the thing, these guidelines aren’t mandatory, but they are frequently used as the basis for worker safety standards set by agencies like the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. So, you know, those guidelines are kind of a big deal.
Jane Thomason, a lead industrial hygienist for National Nurses United, seems pretty concerned about all of this. She told CNN that the decisions made in these guidelines could quite literally determine whether healthcare workers live or die. That’s heavy, man.
Now, Thomason, along with National Nurses United, has filed a request for meeting summaries regarding the committee’s work because, well, they’re a bit suspicious. They think the committee might be more focused on business concerns than actually protecting the health of healthcare workers and patients. I guess they’re not buying what the committee’s selling.
- Long COVID: The Uninvited Guest that Sticks Around
- Drowsy Driving: A Wake-Up Call for Teens
- Put down the saltshaker — especially if you’re at risk of type 2 di...
Dr. David Michaels, an epidemiologist and professor at the George Washington University School of Public Health, thinks that these guidelines are a step backward. He believes that the committee’s knowledge on infection control might be a bit outdated. He even went as far as saying that the committee lacks expertise in worker protection and aerosol science. Ouch, that’s gotta sting.
The evidence that the CDC committee is relying on, which claims that surgical masks work just as well as N95 masks, has raised eyebrows among the critics. They don’t quite buy it, and neither do I. Seems like the committee might have some preconceived notions about infection control. Maybe they need a reality check.
But wait, it gets even juicier! CNN reports that among the committee members are three people who published an editorial arguing against universal masking in healthcare settings to prevent the spread of COVID. It’s like having someone on a fitness committee who hates exercise. Doesn’t make much sense, does it?
Now, as for the final guidelines, we’ll have to wait until 2024 for those bad boys. Until then, the draft guidelines will be forwarded to the CDC for approval, but who knows if they’ll request further review. The drama continues!
So, what do you think about all of this? Are the guidelines truly putting profits over health? Do you trust that surgical masks are just as effective as N95 masks? Let us know in the comments below! And remember, stay safe out there, folks.
More information
The Department of Health and Human Services has more on the impact of COVID-19 on the healthcare workforce.
Source: CNN
Question: Bowel regularity means a bowel movement every day. See Answer